Canare LV61S RG59 Coaxial Video Cable 24G White 153M (500ft) Reel

Canare LV61S RG59 Coaxial Video Cable 24G White 153M (500ft) Reel

Marsoni

M251S

$100.25

Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping. Friday, May 29

Canare LV61S RG59 Coaxial Video Cable 24G White 153M (500ft) ReelCANLV61SWHI153M Canare LV 61S RG59 U Video Coax Cable White 153 Meter Reel (500 FT) A lightweight, VERY flexible RG59 U equivalent that is perfect for all video facility equipment interfacing, ENG OB work and video patch cords assemblies. Smooth non glare finish PVC jackets are available in all 10 Canare Colors, including Chroma Key Blue. Features and Specifications: Stays flexible even in sub zero weather Tightly woven, >: 94% Bare Copper Braid

Easy Shipping

Quick Dispatch:

Your Canare LV61S RG59 Coaxial Video Cable 24G White 153M (500ft) Reel orders ship within 1-2 business days.

Delivery Options:

Standard: 3-7 business days
Fast: 2-3 business days
Express: 1-2 business days

Order Tracking:

You'll receive a tracking link by email once your Canare LV61S RG59 Coaxial Video Cable 24G White 153M (500ft) Reel ships.

Need Help?
Questions about Canare LV61S RG59 Coaxial Video Cable 24G White 153M (500ft) Reel, sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.

Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for Canare LV61S RG59 Coaxial Video Cable 24G White 153M (500ft) Reel in your area.

Get Shipping Estimates

Country Zip/Postal Code

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

I usually would buy XL size but in this case I bought XXL thinking since it's cotton it might shrink. But when I tried the T-shirt it was too small. My older XL sized T-shirt has 2 1/2" larger total shoulder width and 3" wider body width. See attached pictures. Length was also a bit shorter by about 1/2". I will to return it.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on April 15, 2026

Verified Purchase

Pattie B

Chelsea, US

★★★★★ 2

Does not match the size

Size: 3X-Large, Color: Blue

Way smaller than the size indicated. Very thin material, almost see- thru.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on December 5, 2025

Verified Purchase

Robert

Lexington, US

★★★★★ 5

Will buy again

Size: XX-Large, Color: White

Very comfortable. Fits as expected,

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on September 15, 2025

Verified Purchase

David M.

Cuba, US

★★★★★ 5

Feels good on a cool day.

Size: Large, Color: Navy Blue

Why did you pick this product vs others?: I was looking for a mock turtle neck T-shirt so I was a bit surprised they were almost like a very light undershirt or sweater., or heavy tee. I like to wear them when it's cool or under a shirt or sweater. Washability: Machine wash, dry on warm as it's got spandex in it. Has held up to machine washing without loosing elasticity. Quality: Not a highly refined shirt. Quality is ok but could be better. Weight: About like a heavy tee shirt or very light undershirt. Fit: About like a tee shirt. Loose fit.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on June 29, 2025

Verified Purchase

Sky Soldier

Carnegie, US

★★★★★ 5

The material and tight fitting helps keep you warm…

Size: Large, Color: Green

I am 5’8” tall and weigh in at 172 lbs dressed. These are the most comfortable cold weather shirts I have ever worn. In my humble opinion, what makes these shirts so comfortable and warm is the tight fitting and the soft, fleece like feeling on my skin. I wear and ordered the large size. The shirt is cut so they fit close to one’s body and look great compared to other brands of shirts that end up looking like one is wearing a potato bag. The tight fitting helps keep me feeling warm. No cold air pockets.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on January 27, 2026